Do actively managed funds perform better than index funds? A test in the Canadian market
Abstract
Actuality of the study: Mutual funds are a favourite investment product among many investors. They provide a simple means of diversification, especially for those with smaller amounts of capital, and the popularity of mutual funds has increased with the success of the marketing efforts behind them.
Purpose: This study evaluates the performance of actively managed and index mutual funds within the Canadian equities market.
Findings: As index investing has increased in popularity, and other markets have become more connected and open, there is a need for research on equity mutual funds in countries outside the US.
Originality / Value: The majority of previous research on index funds and actively managed mutual funds is focused on the US market and related indexes such as the S&P 500.
Practical implications: This study suggests that, on average, active funds in Canada fail to beat their benchmarks net (but not gross) of the common fee or management expense ratio. Surprisingly, this research finds no positive relationship between higher fees and better gross performance. Actively managed funds also have poorer performance over the long term. This study finds that investors would be better off purchasing low cost index funds as they provide a more secure return.
Future research: This study endorses research on other markets with inclusion of additional variables in order to explain gross performance and secure returns.
Downloads
References
Barber, B. M., Odean, T., & Zheng, L. (n.d.). Out of Sight, Out of Mind: The Effects of Expenses on Mutual Fund Flows. SSRN Electronic Journal. CrossRef.
Bogle, J. C. (2002). An Index Fund Fundamentalist. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 28(3), 31–38. CrossRef.
Carhart, M. M. (1997). On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.
Chevalier, J., & Ellison, G. (1996). Are Some Mutual Funds Managers Better Than Others? Cross-Sectional Patterns in Behavior and Performance. Journal of Finance, 54(3), 875–899. CrossRef.
Cuthbertson, K., Nitzsche, D., & O’Sullivan, N. (2010). Mutual Fund Performance: Measurement and Evidence1. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 19(2), 95–187. CrossRef.
Deaves, R. (2004). Data-conditioning biases, performance, persistence and flows: The case of Canadian equity funds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(3), 673–694. CrossRef.
Gil-Bazo, J., & Ruiz-Verdú, P. (2009). The Relation between Price and Performance in the Mutual Fund Industry. The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 2153–2183. CrossRef.
Goetzmann, W., Ingersoll, J., Spiegel, M., & Welch, I. (2002). Sharpening Sharpe Ratios. CrossRef.
Houge, T., & Wellman, J. W. (2006). The Use and Abuse of Mutual Fund Expenses. SSRN Electronic Journal. CrossRef.
Jensen, M. C. (1968). The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964. The Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389–416. CrossRef.
Malkiel, B. G. (1995). Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 1991. The Journal of Finance, 50(2), 549-572. CrossRef.
Mamaysky, H., Spiegel, M., & Zhang, H. (2007). Improved Forecasting of Mutual Fund Alphas and Betas. Review of Finance, 11(3), 359–400. CrossRef.
Minor, D. B. (2001). Beware of Index Fund Fundamentalists. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 27(4), 45-50. CrossRef.
Morningstar Expense Ratio (2016). Retrieved from morningstar.com.
Morningstar Standard Deviation and Sharpe Ratio (2005). Retrieved from corporate.morningstar.com .
Morningstar. Total Return/ Morningstar (2016). Retrieved from http://www.morningstar.com/InvGlossary/total-return.aspx.
Randall, D. (2014) Analysis: High-priced index funds? The worst deal for investors. Reuters. Retrieved from reuters.com .
Sharpe, W. F. (1994). The Sharpe Ratio. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(1), 49-58. CrossRef.
Sinha, R. & Jog, V. M. (2005). Fund Flows and Performance - A Study of Canadian Equity Funds. Retrieved from economics.ca .
Sirri, E. R., & Tufano, P. (1998). Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows. The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1589–1622. CrossRef.
Treynor, J., & Mazuy K. (1966) Can Mutual Funds Outguess the Market? Harvard Business Review, 44, 131-136.
Wermers, R. (2000). Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock-Picking Talent, Style, Transactions Costs, and Expenses. The Journal of Finance, 55(4), 1655–1695. CrossRef.
Copyright (c) 2016 The Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk University. Series: Management of Innovations
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
ISSN 
ISSN 
