Non-material component of group labor motivation


Keywords: non-material motivation of a group, cohesion, motivational type of workers, labor productivity, intangible incentives, production enterprise

Abstract

A limitation in financial resources of enterprises to increase financial incentives, in particular real wages of employees, led to paying more attention to the non-material part of motivation. Since the motives and incentives of group motivation have not been studied sufficiently, while the approaches used for individual motivation of employees, are not always applicable for the motivation of a group, the subject of present study is relevant. 

The goal of present work is to characterize non-material component of labor group motivation, motivational types of workers and to define possible intangible incentives specific to motivate a group to achieve its goal.

Labor motivation should be considered as a system of components that represent a set of motives of internal and external origin, stimulating drivers that induce a labor collective to work actively towards achieving both personal and enterprise goals. Highly motivated employees are interested employees and, therefore, when reaching common goals of the enterprise, they satisfy their personal needs and consciously choose a certain type of conduct. 

We characterized the underlying motives (needs), which encourage employees to work. It is emphasized that the motives that define human behavior in the process of work are in plenty, but it is run by only a few of them, one of which necessarily prevails. A selection of team members with regard to differences in motives provides for the prerequisites for success.

We assumed that under critical conditions, motivational needs of both individual employees and groups are mostly related to the expectation of financial remuneration for the work done. Under limited financial resources, it is expedient to use intangible incentives. When choosing them, manager should take into account the fact that in order to improve results of the work, employees must be in an environment that meets their basic emotional state. The integral components of such a "healthy" environment are proper subordination, corporate etiquette, microclimate in the team, presence of an experienced manager.

Motivational impact on both the individual worker and the group as a whole is realized taking into consideration the differences in needs, character features, working behavior, status, qualifications, experience, and worldview. Present article characterized motivational types of workers by these criteria and assessed their ability to work in a group by a scale of "low capability – high capability". It was concluded that for the effective motivation of work of the group during team formation, preference should be given to people who can handle household work, who, along with those of the instrumental type, meet the requirements of effective work to a large degree.

Recommendations are given on using motivational incentives in the context of the "application of incentives – forming the conditions".

Scientific novelty of present research is the identification of motivational type of employee most inclined to work in group by comparing their needs and incentives. 

Results of the study might be used to create real conditions at an enterprise to build up group labor motivation and to engage each employee for increasing labor productivity.

Promising directions for further research is the assessment of effectiveness of particular proposed motivational incentives to increase effectiveness of group work in different spheres of activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Branson, R. (2015). The 5 Secrets of Motivation from The Virgin Group. Retrieved August 30, 2016, from Undercover Recruiter: TheUndercoverRecruiter.com .

Druskat, V. U., & Wheeler, J. V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: the effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 435-457. CrossRef.

Dubich, S., & Vasilkivska, Y. (2013). Zvyazok osobustisnuh vlastuvostey pratsivnukiv z riznumu tipamu ih trudovoi motuvatsii. DNU im. О. Gonchara. Retrieved from: rusnauka.com (in Ukrainian).

Gorban’, S. F. (2012). Dіаgnоstika motuvatsii pratsi personalu na pidpruyemstvi [Diagnostics of Staff Motivation at the Enterprise]. Teoretyčni i praktyčni aspekty ekonomiky ta intelektualʹnoji vlasnosti [Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Economics and Intellectual Property], 1(1), 69-74 (in Ukrainian).

Gutsan, О. M. (2013) Моtuvаtsіynuy mechanizm formuvannya kompetentsiy pratsivnuka [Motivation Mechanism of Formation of Employee’s Competences]. Business Inform, 11, 240-245 (in Ukrainian).

Johnson, J. D. (2016). Tensions between Teams and Their Leaders. Journal of technology management & innovation, 11(3), 117-126. CrossRef.

Krupskyi, O. P, Schypanova. A. V, & Stasiuk, Y. M. (2010). Metodyka rozrobky socialnoho paketu v ukrajinskyx kompanijax v suasnyx umovax [Methods of development of the social package in Ukrainian companies in modern conditions]. Zbirnyk naukovyрh prac erkaskoho deravnoho texnolohinoho universytetu. Ser. : Ekonomini nauky [Proceedings of Scientific Works of Cherkasy state technological university. Series: Economics], 26(1), 242-247 (in Ukrainian).

Kushneruk, О. (2012). Sotsialno-ekonomichniy zmist motuvatsii pratsi. [Socially is Economic Maintenance of Concept of Motivation of Labour]. Ekonomika, finance, pravo, 7, 16-19 (in Ukrainian).

Myagkih, І. М. (2011). Perspektuvni napryamu motuvatsii yak zasoby pidvushennya effektuvnosti pratsi v Ukraini [Prospective Directions in Motivation as a Means of Increasing the Labour Efficiency Under Market Conditions of Ukraine]. Аktualni problemu еkоnоmіku, 9(123), 208-216 (in Ukrainian).

Nohria, N., Groysberg, B., & Lee, L. E. (2008). Employee motivation: a powerful new model. Harvard Business Review: Spesial HBS Centennial, 86(7/8), 78-84.

Nujnuk, V., & Kharun, О. (2011). Меkhanizm motuvatsii vusokoproduktuvnoi pratsi personal pidpruemstv: monografiya. HNU, Khmelnitskiy (in Ukrainian).

Pogorelov, M., & Gordienko, A. (2013). Suchasni problemu motivatsii pratsivnukiv ta shlyahu ih vurishennya. Visnyk Nacionalʹnoho texničnoho universytetu "XPI". Ser.: Texničnyj prohres ta efektyvnistʹ vyrobnyctva, 22, 105-109 (in Ukrainian).

Sardak, S. (2012). Evoljucija pohljadiv na zmist i rolʹ ljudsʹkyx resursiv u suspilʹnomu postupi [Evolution of Views on the Content and the Role of Human Resources in Society Development]. Аktualni problemu еkоnоmіku, 12, 132-139 (in Ukrainian).

Teylor, F. (1991). Printsipy nauchnogo menedgmenta [The Principles of Scientific Management]. Коntrolling, Мoskva (in Russian).

Vodopyanov, К. (2010). Sotsialno – philisofskiy analiz motuvatsiynogo protsesu: mojluvosti rezonansnogo upravlinnya. Gumanitarniy visnuk ZDIA, 37, 112-122 (in Ukrainian).

Zayats, N.O., & Kоvаlchuk, А. P. (2012). Osoblyvosti formuvannya indyvidualnoi i gruppovoi motuvatsii. Іnnоvаtsіynа еkоnоmіkа. Vseukr. naukovо-vurobn. zhurnal, 31(5), 316-320 (in Ukrainian).

Zаkаbluk, G. О. (2013). Udоskоnаlеnnya form I system oplatu pratsi za motuvatsiynum ta stumulyuyuchum mehanizmamu [Improvement of forms and compensation systems on motivational and stimulating mechanisms]. Derzhava ta regionu. Ekonomika ta pіdpruemnutstvo, 2(71), 109-114 (in Ukrainian).

Іlyash, О. І., & Shkil, N.B. (2005). Оbgrutuvannya меtоduku sotsiologichnogo doslidgennya dlya оtsinku trudovogo potentsialu pidpruemstva [Ground of method sociologica l research for estimation of labour potential of enterprise] Naukovyj visn. NLTU Ukrajiny [Scientific Bulletin of Ukrainian National Forestry University], 15, 249-254 (in Ukrainian).

Кravchenkо, S. І., & Nedbayeva V.M. (2005). Formuvannya sistemu motuvatsii іnnоvаtsіynоy diyalnosti pratsivnukiv pіdpruemstva. Nauk. pr., 87, 83-90 (in Ukrainian).

Маchtаkоva, О. G. (2010). Evolutsiya kontseptsii motuvatsii yak skladovoyi strategichnogo upravlinnya nа pidpruyemstvi. Visnuk sotsialno-еkоnоmіchnuh doslidgen : zb. nаuk. pr. [Socio-economic Research Bulletin], 40, 99-107 (in Ukrainian).

Маzhnik, N. A., & Bіluk, І. Yu. (2013). Vpluv fіnаnsоvuh fаktоrіv mоtuvatsii nа effectuvnist upravlinnya pеrsоnаlоm. [The Influence of Financial Factors of Motivation of Personnel Management]. Business Inform, 1, 314-320 (in Ukrainian).

Оuchi, U. (1993). Меtody organizatsii proizvodstva: yaponskii i amerikanskii podhody. Nauka, Моskvа (in Ukrainian).
Published
2016-12-25
How to Cite
Don, O., & Privarnikova, I. (2016). Non-material component of group labor motivation. European Journal of Management Issues, (7), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.15421/191619