Dynamic capability: A capability or a capacity?
Purpose. Purpose of the research is to analyze of the concept of dynamic capabilities aiming at formation of the correct terminology.
Design/Method/Approach. This a conceptual paper is based on the academic literature analysis.
Findings. The paper analysed the historical development of the concept of dynamic capabilities from the moment of introduction of this expression and till now. The study described the main theoretical struggles іn the concept, which can have influence on the correct understanding and, thus, translation. The two main academic discussions concerned with dynamic capabilities are reviewed. Different definitions of organizational capabilities are analyzed and their influence on the formation of the understanding of dynamic capabilities is performed. A set of most popular definitions of dynamic capabilities is offered in the work. Those definitions indicate different aspects of the currently running academic discussion on the concept.
Theoretical implications. This paper is important for the academic discussion on dynamic capabilities in the Ukrainian academic segment, since an approach for unambiguous understanding of the terminology of this concept is proposed.
Originality/value. Since different understandings of the concept of dynamic capabilities may mislead the translators from English into Ukrainian, the most appropriate translation terminology is proposed.
Paper type – conceptual.
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46. CrossRef
Arend, R. J., & Bromiley, P. (2009). Assessing the dynamic capabilities view: Spare change, everyone? Strategic Organization, 7(1), 75–90. CrossRef
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. CrossRef
Barney, J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641. CrossRef
Barney, J. B. (1992). Integrating organizational behavior and strategy formulation research: A resource based analysis. Advances in Strategic Management, 8(1), 39–61.
Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299–1315. CrossRef
Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280. CrossRef
Bingham, C. B., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Furr, N. R. (2007). What makes a process a capability? Heuristics, strategy, and effective capture of opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 27–47. CrossRef
Bogodistov, Y., Krupskyi, O., Sardak, S. (2016). Dinamicheskie sposobnosti: sravnenie metodov izmerenijа na primere malyh i srednih predprijаtii Ukrainy [Dynamic Capabilities: a Comparison of Measurement Methods on the Example of Small and Medium Enterprises in Ukraine]. Economic Scope, 110, 139-161 (in Russian).
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. CrossRef
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1105–1121. CrossRef
Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387. CrossRef
Grebeshkova, O. M., & Malyarchuk, O. G. (2013). DinamIchnI zdatnostI pidpriemstva: sposobi viyavlennya ta vIdstezhennya rozvinenostI [Dynamic Capabilities of an Enterprise: Methods of Revelation and Tracing Maturity]. Biznes-Inform, 7, 321–326. (in Ukrainian).
Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (1st ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Krasnokutska, N. S. (2009). PotentsIal pidpriemstva yak ob’ekt upravlInnya v perebIgu evolyutsIyi teorIyi strategIchnogo upravlInnya [Potential of Enterprise as a Management Object in the View of Strategic Management Theory Evolution]. VIsnik SumDU. SerIya EkonomIka, 1, 169–177. (in Ukrainian).
Lavrenenko, V. V. (2011). OrganIzatsIyne navchannya na osnovi kontseptsiyi dinamIchnih zdIbnostey. EkonomIchna TeorIya, 4, 65–72. (in Ukrainian).
Li, D., & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2793–2799. CrossRef
Malyarchuk, O. G. (2010). Klasifikatsiya zdatnostey pidpriemstva. EkonomIka ta Pidpriemnitstvo: Zb. Nauk. Prats Molodih Uchenih Ta AspIrantIv, 25, 95–101. (in Ukrainian).
Markov, O. M. (2013). Ekonomichna dinamika i zdatnist pidpriemstva do adaptatsiyi [Economic dynamics and ability of the enterprise to adaption]. RegIonalna BIznes-EkonomIka Ta UpravlInnya, 1, 83–87. (in Ukrainian).
Nikolyuk, O. M. (2010). Stiyki konkurentni perevagi pidpriemstva: sutnist, dzherela formuvannya [Sustainable competitive advantages: the essence and sources of formation]. VIsnik Zhitomirskogo NatsIonalnogo AgroekologIchnogo UnIversitetu, 2(27-2), 228–239. (in Ukrainian).
Peteraf, M., Di Stefano, G., & Verona, G. (2013). The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together. Strategic Management Journal, 34(12), 1389–1410. doi:10.1002/smj.2078. CrossRef
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based «view» a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40. CrossRef
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27–43. CrossRef
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. CrossRef
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. CrossRef
Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537–556. CrossRef
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. CrossRef
Winter, S. G. (2000). The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 981–996. CrossRef
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. CrossRef
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. CrossRef
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955. CrossRef
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351. CrossRef
Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. (2012). The affective side of dynamic capability: How founders’ emotion regulation activates human and social capital in firms. Presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting (AOM), Boston.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).