Dynamic managerial capabilities: lessons from non-profits in highly dynamic environments
Purpose. Drawing on the concept of dynamic managerial capabilities, to propose a model that incorporates managerial human and social capital, and managerial cognition in the dynamic capabilities framework.
Design/Method/Approach. The study is an empirical in the context of the current conflict in the eastern Ukraine and is an analysis a non-profit field with an extremely high dynamic environment. The data was collected using a quantitative survey with 70 private corps, non-commissioned officers, and higher-ranked officers.
Findings. The model provides a direct relationship between dynamic capabilities and dynamic managerial capabilities, whereby the latter is constituted by the perceived manager’s competence (manager’s human capital), manager’s team (manager’s social capital), and manager’s goal congruence towards the goals of the organization (managerial cognition).
Theoretical implications. This paper expanded the body of research on dynamic managerial capabilities by developing the following arguments: (1) dynamic managerial capabilities directly influence organizational dynamic capabilities; (2) managerial social capital mediates relationships between managerial human capital and organizational dynamic capabilities; (3) managerial social capital mediates relationships between managerial cognition and organizational dynamic capabilities.
Originality/value. This research not only shows how a non-profit organization can act efficiently, it is also an example of an application of strategic management theory to a practical field with life or death consequences.
Research limitations/Future research. This research opens avenues for future research on dynamic capabilities in non-profit organizations.
Paper type – empirical.
Barreto, I. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280. doi:10.1177/0149206309350776. CrossRef
Bogodistov, Y. (2015). Psychological microfoundations and activation of dynamic managerial capabilities: Influence of affective states on managerial behavior. Frankfurt (Oder), Germany: Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt. Retrieved December 20, 2016, from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:521-opus4-1592. nbn-resolving.de
Boyne, G. (2002). Public and private management: what’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97–122. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00284. CrossRef
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9. CrossRef
Dost, F. (2015). A non-linear causal network of marketing channel system structure. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 23, 49–57. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.11.005. CrossRef
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105–1121. doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E. CrossRef
Essens, P., Vogelaar, A., Mylle, J., Baranski, J., Goodwin, G., van Buskirk, W., Berggren, P., Hof, T. (2010). CTEF 2.0-Assessment and Improvement of Command Team Effectiveness: Verification of Model and Instrument. Neuilly-sur-Seine Cedex, France: NATO Research and Technology Organisation.
Felin, T., & Foss, N. J. (2009). Organizational routines and capabilities: Historical drift and a course-correction toward microfoundations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(2), 157–167. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2009.02.003. CrossRef
Haslam, N., & Fiske, A. P. (1999). Relational models theory: A confirmatory factor analysis. Personal Relationships, 6(2), 241–250. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00190.x. CrossRef
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. doi:10.1002/smj.332. CrossRef
Kor, Y. Y., & Mesko, A. (2012). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Configuration and orchestration of top executives’ capabilities and the firm’s dominant logic. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 233–244. doi:10.1002/smj.2000. CrossRef
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319–338. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535. CrossRef
Li, D., & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2793–2799. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.007. CrossRef
Newell, S., Tansley, C., & Huang, J. 2004. Social capital and knowledge integration in an ERP project team: the importance of bridging and bonding. British Journal of Management, 15(S1): S43–S57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00399.x. CrossRef
Piening, E. P. (2013). Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations. Public Management Review, 15(2), 209–245. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.708358. CrossRef
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. doi:10.1177/014920638601200408. CrossRef
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 4(3), 879–891. doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879. CrossRef
Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., & McEvily, B. (2004). How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 101–133.
Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009). A Tale of Three Perspectives. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762–800. doi:10.1177/109442810933283. CrossRef
Segal, D. R., & Segal, M. W. (1983). Change in military organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 9(1), 151–170. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.001055. CrossRef
Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2009). Contingencies within dynamic managerial capabilities: Interdependent effects of resource investment and deployment on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(13), 1375–1394. doi:10.1002/smj.791. CrossRef
Takens, F. (1981). Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Warwick 1980, 366–381. doi:10.1007/bfb0091924. CrossRef
Talbot, P. A. (2003). Management organisational history – a military lesson? Journal of European Industrial Training, 27(7), 330–340. doi:10.1108/03090590310490007. CrossRef
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. doi:10.1002/smj.640. CrossRef
Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: an Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537-556. doi:10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a. CrossRef
The Economist. (2015). Crisis in Ukraine. The Economist. http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2015/06/ukraine-graphics?zid=307&ah=5e80419d1bc9821ebe173f4f0f060a07. Accessed December 2oth 2016. economist.com
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. doi:10.2307/3069429. CrossRef
Webster, E. (2004). Firms’ decisions to innovate and innovation routines. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(8), 733–745. doi:10.1080/10438590410001686824. CrossRef
Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method Variance and Marker Variables: A Review and Comprehensive CFA Marker Technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477–514. doi:10.1177/1094428110366036. CrossRef
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. doi:10.1002/smj.318. CrossRef
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process pf viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).