Cognitive and emotional experiences of working in a glass office: a case study on normative control
Abstract
Purpose/Research question. The increased opportunities for surveillance in glass offices motivate the study to pursue the following research question: how does normative control operate in a glass office working environment?
Design/Method/Approach. A case study approach was adopted in order to explore the phenomenon in its context. The empirical data consist of twenty semi-structured interviews conducted at the business school of a large UK-based university.
Findings. The article reveals the cognitive and emotional experiences of working in a glass office. Normative control is exercised through the building`s design and through managerial discourse. The study also captures employees´ response to the control attempt related to resistance to exposure and impression management.
Theoretical implications and Originality. Prior literature that investigates the concept of organizational space as a structure of control links it to bureaucratic control functioning vertically through direct managerial supervision and instructions. The present article demonstrates how control can work on the horizontal level through the management of beliefs, norms, emotions, and social influence.
Research limitations/Future research. To the limitations of this research belong issues concerning internal validity, such as the inability to use multiple sources of data generation (observations, document analysis) in order to ensure triangulation.
Paper type – empirical.
Downloads
References
Alvesson, M. (2004). Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619–644. CrossRef
Baldry, C. (1999). Space-the final frontier. Sociology, 33(3), 535-553. CrossRef
Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis (Vol. 248). London: Heinemann.
Collinson, D. L., & Collinson, M. (1997). ‘Delayering managers’: Time-space surveillance and its gendered effects. Organization, 4(3), 375-407. CrossRef
Costas, J. (2012). We Are All Friends Here. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(4), 377-395. CrossRef
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. CrossRef
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Gabriel, Y. (2005). Glass Cages and Glass Palaces: Images of Organization in Image-Conscious Times. Organization, 12(1), 9–27. CrossRef
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. University of California Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Stanford University Press.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. CrossRef
Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kruse, J. (2015). Qualitative Interviewforschung: Ein integrativer Ansatz. Weinheim: Juventa Verlag.
Kunda, G. (2006). Engineering culture (rev. ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. (Original work published 1992)
Meyer, H. (1997). Tearing Down the Walls. Journal of Business Strategy, 18(6), 24–29. CrossRef
Saunders, M. and Lewis, P. (2012). Doing Research in Business and Management: An Essential Guide to Planning Your Project. 1st ed., Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students. 6th ed., Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Shellenbarger, S. (2012). Indecent Exposure: The Downsides of Working in a Glass Office. Retrieved from The Wall Street Journal website: wsj.com
Weber, M. (1922). Economy and society. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. 4th ed., California: Sage.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
ISSN 
ISSN 
