Management of the process of formation and realization of competitive advantages of the Visegrad Four countries in the European market of ICT services
Purpose – to assess the integration and management of the formation and implementation of the competitive advantages of the Visegrad Four countries in the European market of information, computer, telecommunication (ICT) services based on their analysis in the individual market segments.
Design/Method/Research approach - this study aims to determine the presence and nature of the competitive advantages of countries in the European ICT services market based on the calculation of export specialization indicators, to establish factors for their growth and effective implementation based on the results of structural, regressive, comparative analysis and synthesis.
Findings. It has been suggested that the introduction of the European rules for market organization stimulated the building-up in the Visegrad Four countries of their competitive advantages in the European ICT services market through innovative investment resources, effective management of private, public sector and international investors and personnel.
Practical implications. The accession of Eastern European countries to the European digital market and digital space requires a generalization of the experience of the Visegrad four countries and the identification of factors, directions and priorities of the national policy for the development of the ICT sector.
Originality/Value. Scientific novelty of the study - based on the calculation of the comparative advantage index, different integration and effectiveness of managing the competitive advantages of the Visegrad Four countries, primarily the sphere of IC services to the European market (relatively high - in the Czech Republic due to state financing, moderate – in Poland due to financial support from the state, in Slovakia due to private investment in R&D, low – in Hungary), this situation requires a balanced innovation and investment strategy of the countries in the future, the training of a sufficient number of qualified IT specialists, stimulation of private investment in R&D and business cooperation with the sphere of knowledge by means of tax and administrative incentives, facilitating the transition of small and medium-sized businesses on the principles of economics 4.0.
Paper type – empirical.
Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School, 33(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x.
Bočková, N. (2013). Visegrad Four countries: evaluation in R&D sectors of performance. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(4), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361040873.
Capik, P., & Drahokoupil, J. (2011). Foreign direct investments in business services: transforming the Visegrád four region into a knowledge-based economy? Journal European Planning Studies, 19(9), 1611-1631. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.586181.
Dzyad, O., Krasnikova, N., Hrechyn K. (2019). Konkurentni perevahy krayin Vyshehradsʹkoyi hrupy na vnutrishnʹomu yevropeysʹkomu rynku silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkykh tovariv [Competitive Advantages of the Visegrad Countries on the European Internal Agricultural Market]. Infrastruktura rynka [Market Infrastructure], 31, 19-27. Retrieved from http://market-infr.od.ua/journals/2019/31_2019_ukr/5.pdf (in Ukrainian).
European Commission (2015). Why we need a Digital Single Market – Factsheet. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/why-we-need-digital-single-market_en.
European Commission (2018a). Roadmap for completing the Digital Single Market. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/10dc8396-3dfc-11e8-b5fe-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-120120545.
European Commission (2018b). Digital Economy and Society Index 2019 – Country Reports. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/digital-economy-and-society-index-desi-2019.
European Commission (2019).The EU ICT sector and its R&D performance. Digital Economy and Society Index Report, 2019. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=59978.
European Commission (2020a). Shaping the digital transformation in Europe – Working paper: Economic potential. Report/stady. Shaping Europe’s digital future. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/shaping-digital-transformation-europe-working-paper-economic-potential.
European Commission (2020b). Research and Innovation Observatory - Horizon 2020 Policy Support Facility. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved from https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/country-analysis.
Eurostat (2019). Database – Eurostat. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
EUR- Lex (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019L0790.
Fekó, А. (2011). ICT industry r&d in Hungary.Challenges of the Knowledge Society IT, 2011, 2009-20218. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3kk95nH.
Jedlička, J., Kotian, J., & Münz, R. (2014). Visegrad Four-10 years of EU membership. Erste Group Research CEE Special Report, 23 April 2014, 1-23. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3klOvTU.
Kovárník, J., & Hamplová, E. (2016). The analysis of foreign trade development in the countries of Visegrad Four. XIX. Mezinárodní Kolokvium o Regionálních Vědách. Sborník Příspěvků. https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-8273-2016-30.
Kovárník, J., & Hamplová, E. (2020). Globalization and Foreign Trade: Selected Topics in Central European Countries. SHS Web of Conferences, 74, 06014. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207406014.
Kowalska, A., Kovarnik, J., Hamplova, E., & Prazak, P. (2018). The Selected Topics for Comparison in Visegrad Four Countries. Economies, 6(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6030050.
Melikhova, Y., Baz˘ó, L., Holubcova, I., & Camacho, J. A. (2015). Trade in services and tertiarisation of the Visegrád Four economies. Post-Communist Economies, 27(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2015.992219.
Porter, M. E. (1990). Determinants of National Competitive Advantage. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, 69–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1_3.
Kateřina, P., & Petra, M. (2014). Czech Republic's competitiveness in ICT market. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 880-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.558.
Šebová, M., Hudec, O. (2012). The ICT Sector Evolution in an Industrial Region of Slovakia. Journal of Economics, 01, 65-82. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260986987_The_I
CT_Sector_Evolution_in_an_Industrial_Region_of_Slovakia. Szent-Iványi, B. (2017). Investment promotion in the Visegrad four countries: post-FDI challenges. Condemned to be left behind? Can Central and Eastern Europe emerge from its low-wage mode? Publisher: ETUI aisbl, Brussels, Editors: Béla Galgóczi, Jan Drahokoupil, 171-188. ISBN 978-2-87452-461-5. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320417550_Invest ment_promotion_in_the_Visegrad_four_countries_post- FDI_challenges.
Szwinta, P. (2014). Concentration of the ict industry in the Czech Republic, Germany and Poland. ACC Journal Science of Economics, (2), 63-71. Retrieved from http://dspace.tul.cz/bitstream/handle/15240/19886/ACC_2014_2_06.pdf.
Turečková, K. (2016). Sectoral Specialization as a Source of Competitiveness: Case Study on ICT Sector in V4+ Countries. International Conference on European Integration 2016 Ostrava, Czech Republic, 1023-1029.
Vollrath, T. (1991). A Theoretical Evaluation of Alternative Trade Intensity Measures of Revealed Comparative Advantage. Review of World Economics, 127(2), 265-280.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).