Management of the process of formation and realization of competitive advantages of the Visegrad Four countries in the European market of ICT services

Keywords: export specialization, European market, ICT services, national strategies, innovation and investment factors


Purpose – to assess the integration and management of the formation and implementation of the competitive advantages of the Visegrad Four countries in the European market of information, computer, telecommunication (ICT) services based on their analysis in the individual market segments.

Design/Method/Research approach - this study aims to determine the presence and nature of the competitive advantages of countries in the European ICT services market based on the calculation of export specialization indicators, to establish factors for their growth and effective implementation based on the results of structural, regressive, comparative analysis and synthesis.

Findings. It has been suggested that the introduction of the European rules for market organization stimulated the building-up in the Visegrad Four countries of their competitive advantages in the European ICT services market through innovative investment resources, effective management of private, public sector and international investors and personnel.

Practical implications. The accession of Eastern European countries to the European digital market and digital space requires a generalization of the experience of the Visegrad four countries and the identification of factors, directions and priorities of the national policy for the development of the ICT sector.

Originality/Value. Scientific novelty of the study - based on the calculation of the comparative advantage index, different integration and effectiveness of managing the competitive advantages of the Visegrad Four countries, primarily the sphere of IC services to the European market (relatively high - in the Czech Republic due to state financing, moderate – in Poland due to financial support from the state, in Slovakia due to private investment in R&D, low – in Hungary), this situation requires a balanced innovation and investment strategy of the countries in the future, the training of a sufficient number of qualified IT specialists, stimulation of private investment in R&D and business cooperation with the sphere of knowledge by means of tax and administrative incentives, facilitating the transition of small and medium-sized businesses on the principles of economics 4.0.

Paper type – empirical.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Olena V. Dzyad, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro, Ukraine

Department of the International economics and International finance

Olga G. Mihaylenko, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro, Ukraine

Department of the International economics and International finance


Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School, 33(2), 99–123. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x.
Bočková, N. (2013). Visegrad Four countries: evaluation in R&D sectors of performance. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(4), 873–880. doi:10.11118/actaun201361040873.
Capik, P., & Drahokoupil, J. (2011). Foreign direct investments in business services: transforming the Visegrád four region into a knowledge-based economy? Journal European Planning Studies, 19(9), 1611-1631. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.586181.
Dzyad, O., Krasnikova, N., Hrechyn K. (2019). Konkurentni perevahy krayin Vyshehradsʹkoyi hrupy na vnutrishnʹomu yevropeysʹkomu rynku silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkykh tovariv [Competitive Advantages of the Visegrad Countries on the European Internal Agricultural Market]. Infrastruktura rynka [Market Infrastructure], 31, 19-27. Retrieved from (in Ukrainian).
European Commission (2015). Why we need a Digital Single
Market – Factsheet. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved
from need-digital-single-market_en.
European Commission (2018a). Roadmap for completing the Digital Single Market. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved from /publication/10dc8396-3dfc-11e8-b5fe-01aa75ed71a1/language-
European Commission (2018b). Digital Economy and Society Index
2019 – Country Reports. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved from market/en/news/digital-economy-and-society-index-desi-2019.
European Commission (2019).The EU ICT sector and its R&D performance. Digital Economy and Society Index Report, 2019. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved from 9978.
European Commission (2020a). Shaping the digital transformation in Europe – Working paper: Economic potential. Report/stady. Shaping Europe’s digital future. Retrieved from
digital-transformation-europe-working-paper-economic- potential.
European Commission (2020b). Research and Innovation Observatory - Horizon 2020 Policy Support Facility. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved from
Eurostat (2019). Database – Eurostat. Retrieved from
EUR- Lex (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market. Retrieved from
Fekó, А. (2011). ICT industry r&d in Hungary.Challenges of the Knowledge Society IT, 2011, 2009-20218. Retrieved from
ungary.Challenges+of+the+Knowledge+Society+IT%2C&oq=IC T+industry+r%26d+in+Hungary.Challenges+of+the+Knowledg e+Society+IT%2C&aqs=chrome..69i57.4578j0j7&sourceid=chro me&ie=UTF-8.
Jedlička, J., Kotian, J., & Münz, R. (2014). Visegrad Four-10 years of EU membership. Erste Group Research CEE Special Report, 23 April 2014, 1-23. Retrieved from nk_hr/misc/press/2014/2014_04_23_EN_Report_Visegrad.pdf.
Kovárník, J., & Hamplová, E. (2016). The analysis of foreign trade development in the countries of Visegrad Four. XIX. Mezinárodní Kolokvium o Regionálních Vědách. Sborník Příspěvků. doi:10.5817/cz.muni.p210-8273-2016-30.
Kovárník, J., & Hamplová, E. (2020). Globalization and Foreign Trade: Selected Topics in Central European Countries. SHS Web of Conferences, 74, 06014. doi:10.1051/shsconf/20207406014.
Kowalska, A., Kovarnik, J., Hamplova, E., & Prazak, P. (2018). The Selected Topics for Comparison in Visegrad Four Countries. Economies, 6(3), 50. doi:10.3390/economies6030050.
Melikhova, Y., Baz˘ó, L., Holubcova, I., & Camacho, J. A. (2015). Trade in services and tertiarisation of the Visegrád Four economies. Post-Communist Economies, 27(1), 1–22. doi:10.1080/14631377.2015.992219.
Porter, M. E. (1990). Determinants of National Competitive Advantage. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, 69–130. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1_3.
Kateřina, P., & Petra, M. (2014). Czech Republic's competitiveness in ICT market. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 880-885. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.558.
Šebová, M., Hudec, O. (2012). The ICT Sector Evolution in an Industrial Region of Slovakia. Journal of Economics, 01, 65-82. Retrieved from
CT_Sector_Evolution_in_an_Industrial_Region_of_Slovakia. Szent-Iványi, B. (2017). Investment promotion in the Visegrad four
countries: post-FDI challenges. Condemned to be left behind? Can Central and Eastern Europe emerge from its low-wage mode? Publisher: ETUI aisbl, Brussels, Editors: Béla Galgóczi, Jan Drahokoupil, 171-188. ISBN 978-2-87452-461-5. Retrieved from ment_promotion_in_the_Visegrad_four_countries_post- FDI_challenges.
Szwinta, P. (2014). Concentration of the ict industry in the Czech Republic, Germany and Poland. ACC Journal Science of Economics, (2), 63-71. Retrieved from 2_06.pdf.
Turečková, K. (2016). Sectoral Specialization as a Source of Competitiveness: Case Study on ICT Sector in V4+ Countries. International Conference on European Integration 2016 Ostrava, Czech Republic, 1023-1029.
Vollrath, T. (1991). A Theoretical Evaluation of Alternative Trade Intensity Measures of Revealed Comparative Advantage. Review of World Economics, 127(2), 265-280.
How to Cite
Krasnikova, N., Dzyad, O., Mihaylenko, O., & Hrechyn, K. (2020). Management of the process of formation and realization of competitive advantages of the Visegrad Four countries in the European market of ICT services. European Journal of Management Issues, 28(1-2), 25-33.