Types and terminology of remote project teams
Purpose – to develop project management terminology.
Findings. This study indicates thе significant changes that occurred in working conditions in the last centuries that led to the new models' formation of employee interaction at enterprises, especially remotely, such as distributed, virtual, and dispersed project teams. Clarification of the terminology of project management indicates the meaning of the term "distributed team". This paper separated the term from several related concepts and demonstrated the benefits of integrating distributed project teams within an enterprise.
Originality/Value. Paper analyzes the term, features and differences of the distributed project team from other types of remote teams. Practical implications. The terminology of remote project team can be
used by project managers from a theoretical point of view.
Research limitations/Future research. Future research can focus on the way to manage a distributed project team effectively.
Paper type – theoretical.
Ahuja, J. (2010). A study of virtuality impact on team performance. IUP Journal of Management Research, 9(5), 27-56. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1631684.
Bergiel, B., Bergiel, E., & Balsmeier, P. (2008). Nature of virtual teams: A summary of their advantages and disadvantages. Management Research News, 31(2), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1108%2F01409170810846821
Berntzen, M., & Wong, S. I. 2019. Coordination in Distributed, Self- managing Work Teams: The Roles of Initiated and Received Task Interdependence. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. http://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2019.119.
Bhagwati, J. (2004). In Defense of Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195330939.
Bos, N., Shami, N. S., Olson, J. S., Cheshin, A., & Nan, N. (2004, November). Ingroup/out-group effects in distributed teams: an experimental simulation. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 429- 436). ACM.
Curseu, P. L., Schalk, R., & Wessel, I. (2008). How to virtual teams process information? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(6), 628- 652. https://doi.org/10.1108%2F02683940810894729.
Day, D. V., Fleenor, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Sturm, R. E., & McKee, R. A. (2014). Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 63-82
ECATT Final Report IST Programme (2000). Benchmarking progress on new ways of working and new forms of business across Europe. Feira Summit 20 June 2000. https://web.fhnw.ch/personenseiten/najib.harabi/publications/books/benchmarking-progress-of-telework-and-electronic-commerce-in-europe.
Eubanks, D. L., Palanski, M., Olabisi, J., Joinson, A., & Dove, J. (2016). Team dynamics in virtual, partially distributed teams: Optimal role fulfillment. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 556–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.035.
Fowler, M (2015, October 19). Remote versus Co-located Work. Retrieved from https://martinfowler.com/articles/remote-or-co- located.html.
Friedman, T. (2007). The World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. Picador, 421. ISBN 1-59397-668-2.
Gajendran, R. S., Harrison, D. A., & Delaney‐Klinger, K. (2015). Are Telecommuters Remotely Good Citizens? Unpacking Telecommuting's Effects on Performance Via I‐Deals and Job Resources. Personnel Psychology, 68(2), 353-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12082.
Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Young, N. C. J., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313-1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946.
Glebov, G., Milaeva O. (2010). International relations in the modern world. In Penza state University (Eds.). Modern international relations (pp. 81 – 90). Retrieved from https://dep_km.pnzgu.ru/files/dep_km.pnzgu.ru/sovremennye_mejdunarodnye_otnosheniya.doc
Harrison, A., Wheeler, P., & Whitehead, C. (2003). Distributed Workplace Sustainable Work Environments. London: Spon Press. ISBN 020361657X
Herbsleb, J., Moitra, D. (2001). Global Software Development. USA Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 18 (2), 16-20. https://doi.org/10.1109%2F52.914732.
Hoegl, M., Proserpio, L. (2001). Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence. Organization Science, 12 (4), 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1287%2Forsc.12.4.435.10635.
Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 99(3), 390-403. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030264.
Karia, N., & Asaari, M. H. A. H. (2016). Innovation capability: the impact of teleworking on sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 16(2), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtpm.2016.076318.
Kozlowski, S. W., & Bell, B. S. (2013). Work groups and teams in organizations: Review update [Electronic version]. Retrieved, 24(2016), 412-469.
Kuruppuarachchi, P. (2009). Virtual team concepts in projects: A case study. Project Management Journal, 40(2), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fpmj.20110.
LaBrosse, M. (2008). Managing virtual teams. Employment Relations Today, 35(2), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ert.20205
Lehtonen, I. (2009). Communication Challenges in Agile Global Software Development. University of Helsinki, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science.
Makarius, E. E., & Larson, B. Z. (2017). Changing the Perspective of Virtual Work: Building Virtual Intelligence at the Individual Level. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2014.0120.a.
Martinelli. R., Rahschulte, T., & Waddell, J. (2010). Leading Global Project Teams: The New Leadership Challenge. Oshawa: Multi- Media Publications Inc. ISBN-10:1554890640 ISBN-13:978-1554890644
McNeese, M., Salas, E., & Endsley, M. R. (Eds.). (2020). Foundations and Theoretical Perspectives of Distributed Team Cognition. CRC Press.
Mendonça, M., Zenun, N., Geilson, L., Claudiano S. (2007). The Effects of Teams’ Co-location on Project Performance. Springer London, 717-726. https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-1-84628-976-7_79
O'Duinn, J. (2018). Distributed Teams: The Art and Practice of Working Together While Physically Apart. San Francisco: Release Mechanix, LLC. Book by ISBN-10:1732254907 ISBN-13:978-1732254909
Noroozi, Mehdi (2018). To Slack or not to Slack; challenges of communication and coordination in distributed software development. University of Oslo: Department of Informatics
Paul R., Drake J. and Liang H (2016). "Global Virtual Team Performance: The Effect of Coordination Effectiveness, Trust, and Team Cohesion". IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59 (3), 186-202, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2583319.
Priklandnicki, R., Nicolas, J., & Evarito, R. (2006). A Reference Model for Global Software Development: Findings from a Case Study. IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE ’06). https://doi.org/10.1109%2Ficgse.2006.261212.
Rutkowski, A. F., Saunders, C., Vogel, D., & Van Genuchten, M. (2007). “Is it already 4 am in your time zone?” Focus immersion and temporal dissociation in virtual teams. Small group research, 38(1), 98- 129.Sarpkaya, P. Y. (2014). The effects of principals' loneliness in the workplace on their self-performance. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(20), 967.
Schlenkrich, L., & Upfold, C. (2009). A guideline for virtual team managers. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 12(1), 109-118.
Shachaf, P. (2008). Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impactsbon global virtual teams.
Information & Management, 45(2), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.im.2007.12.003
Schulze, J., Schultze, M., West, S. G., & Krumm, S. (2017). The knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics required for face-to-face versus computermediated communication: Similar or distinct constructs? Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(3), 283- 300
Suprika, V., Hema, D. (2010). Distributed Agile Software Development: A Review. Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, 1 (1), 10-17.
Thomas, D. (2008). Cross-cultural management: Essential concepts. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage. ISBN-10:1452257507, ISBN-13:978-1452257501
Wildman, J. L., & Griffith, R. L. (2015). Leading global teams means dealing with different. In Leading global teams (pp. 1-10). Springer, New York, NY
Webster, J., Wong, W. (2008). Comparing traditional and virtual group forms: identity, communication and trust in naturally occurring project teams. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19 (1), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701763883
Zaveri, P. 2020, April 29. Microsoft Teams now has 75 million daily active users, adding 31 million in just over a month. Business Insider. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-teams-hits-75-million-daily-active-users-2020-4?r=US&IR=T.
Ziebdrat, F., Hoegl, M., & Ernst, H. (2009). How to manage virtual teams. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 63-68.
Zigurs, I. (2003). Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity? Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 339-351. arXiv:1006.1955v1. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-2616(02)00132-8.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).