Review and Comparison of Multi-Method and Mixed Method Application in Research Studies

Keywords: Multi-Method, Mixed Method, Qualitative, Quantitative


Purpose: To explore the feasibility of using the multi-method and mixed-method in research studies by reviewing and comparing both methods.

Design / Method / Approach: Using the literature, historical background on mixed-methods and multiple-methods design principles are collected and applied in this paper in a systematic review format.

Findings: The major finding from this research is that incorporating quantitative and qualitative data in the form of a mixed or multi-method study has the potential to dramatically increase the accuracy and quality of any research's analysis and conclusions.

Theoretical Implications: The study contributes to the theoretical understanding of how mixed and multi-method studies have distinct and distinguishable characteristics; it encourages researchers to conduct investigations appropriately to accomplish their research goals. The authors of this article introduce different designs (e.g., embedded design, explanatory design) which combine a mixed-method approach with a multi-method one.

Practical Implications: This study concludes that both mixed methods and multi methods are reliable and have unique characteristics that increase the validity (i.e., external validity, generalizability) and reliability of study findings.

Originality / Value: The authors of this paper present a taxonomy how to combine mixed methods with multi methods.

Research Limitations / Future Research: Research should be directed at defining the appropriate design for a multi-method approach to help researchers conduct multi method studies scientifically.

Paper Type: Conceptual.


Download data is not yet available.


Abro, M. M. Q., Khurshid, M. A., & Aamir, A. (2015). The use of mixed methods in management research. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 5(2), 1-8. Retrieved from

Abowitz, D. A., & Toole, T. M. (2010). Mixed Method Research: Fundamental Issues of Design, Validity, and Reliability in Construction Research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(1), 108–116.

Archibald, M. M. (2015). Investigator Triangulation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 228–250.

Archibald, M. M., Radil, A. I., Zhang, X., & Hanson, W. E. (2015). Current Mixed Methods Practices in Qualitative Research: A Content Analysis of Leading Journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(2), 5–33.

Arora, R., & Stoner, C. (2009). A mixed method approach to understanding brand personality. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18(4), 272–283.

Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (2006). Foundations of Multimethod Research: Synthesizing styles. Sage.

Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1993). Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 195–207.

Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs. New Directions for Evaluation, 1997 (74), 19–32.

Cram, F., & Mertens, D. M. (2015). Transformative and Indigenous Frameworks for Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research. In The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry.

Clauss, T., & Tangpong, C. (2019). Perception‐based Supplier Attributes and Performance Implications: A Multimethod Exploratory Study. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 55(4), 34–66.

Creswell, J. W. (1999). Mixed-Method Research. Handbook of Educational Policy, 455–472.

Creswell, J. W. (2004). Designing A Mixed Methods Study In Primary Care. The Annals of Family Medicine, 2(1), 7–12.

Creswell, J. W. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4, 269-284. Retrieved from

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Revisiting mixed methods and advancing scientific practices. The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry.

Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Creswell, J.W, Plano Clark, V., Gutmann, M., and Hanson, W (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori and C Teddle (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.

Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88.

Greene, J. C. (2015). Preserving Distinctions Within the Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Merger. Oxford Handbooks Online.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1988). Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies? Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education, 1(1), 89-115.

Halverson, S. L. (2017). Multimethod Approaches. The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, 193–212.

Harrison, R., & Reilly, T. (2011). Mixed methods designs in marketing research. Qualitative Market Research, 14(1), 7-26.

Hanson, W.E., Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P., Petska, K.S., & Creswell, J.D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235.

Hirsch, B. J. (1979). Psychological dimensions of social networks: A multimethod analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 7(3), 263–277.

Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20.

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.

Kettles, A. M., Creswell, J. W., & Zhang, W. (2011). Mixed Methods Research in Mental Health Nursing. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 18(6), 535-542.

Knappertsbusch, F., Langfeldt, B., & Kelle, U. (2021). Mixed-Methods and Multimethod Research. Soziologie - Sociology in the German-Speaking World, 261–272.

Krauss, S. (2005). Research Paradigms and Meaning Making: A Primer. The Qualitative Report, 10(4), 758-770.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences, 163-188. In: Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds., The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2000. Retrieved from

Mackey A., Bryfonski L. (2018) Mixed Methodology. In: Phakiti A., De Costa P., Plonsky L., Starfield S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

McKendrick, J.H. (1999). Multi‐Method Research: An Introduction to Its Application in Population Geography. The Professional Geographer, 51(1), 40-50.

McKendrick, J.H. (2020). Mixed and Multiple Methods. In International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 125-131). Elsevier.

Morse, J.M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 1, 189-208.

Morse, J.M. (2010). Simultaneous and Sequential Qualitative Mixed Method Designs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 483-491.

Okpotor, F.I. (2021). We All Need Philosophy of Science: Analyticism as a Vehicle for Explanatory Understanding in Multi-method Research. African Affairs, 120(479), 277-296.

Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2007). Methods, Mixed. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology.

Östlund, U., Kidd, L., Wengström, Y., & Rowa-Dewar, N. (2011). Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: a methodological review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(3), 369-383.

Palinkas, L.A., Aarons, G.A., Horwitz, S., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M., & Landsverk, J. (2011). Mixed Method Designs in Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 44-53.

Pigram, D., & McGee, W. (2011). Formation Embedded Design: A methodology for the integration of fabrication constraints into architectural design. Retrieved from

Pole, K. (2007). Mixed Methods Designs: A Review of Strategies for Blending Quantitative and Qualitative Methodologies. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 20(4), 35-38. Retrieved from

Rocco, T., Bliss, L., Gallagher, S. & Pérez-Prado, A. (2003). Taking the Next Step: Mixed Methods Research in Organizational Systems. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 21(1), 19-29. Retrieved from

Skirton, H., O’Connor, A., & Humphreys, A. (2012). Nurses’ competence in genetics: A mixed method systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(11), 2387-2398.

Small, M.L. (2009). ‘How many cases do I need?’: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38.

Small, M.L. (2011). How to Conduct a Mixed Methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature. Annual review of sociology, 37, 57-86.

Subedi, D. (2016). Explanatory Sequential Mixed Method Design as the Third Research Community of Knowledge Claim. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 570-577.

Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C., & Teddlie, C.B. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (Vol. 46). Sage.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Sage.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Putting the Human Back in ‘“Human Research Methodology”’: The Researcher in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(4), 271–277.

Vivek, R., & Nanthagopan, Y. (2020). Evolution from operations project management to strategic project management: a systematic review. Journal of Business Studies, 7(2), 7(2), 96–115.

Zhang, W. (2011). Mixed methods embedded design in medical education, mental health and health services research: A methodological analysis. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Retrieved from

How to Cite
Vivek, R., & Nanthagopan, Y. (2021). Review and Comparison of Multi-Method and Mixed Method Application in Research Studies. European Journal of Management Issues, 29(4), 200-208.